On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 08:53:19AM -0600, Randy Hancock wrote:
> We use Hudson for c++ CI. It works very well for us. Just point it to
> a script that kicks off the build (e.g. cmake --build) and have it
> archive the artifacts (build logs, test output, etc.). I'm sure there
> are fancier ways to set it up with plugins but we've gotten by with
> this minimal setup for about 6 months now. It's so easy to get going I
> recommend spending a few hours setting it up just to see if you like
> it. That said, I have not tried CDash.

Hi Randy,

Thanks for the reply. I'm going to try to carve out some time to give
Hudson a test drive.

Thanks,
tyler
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Reply via email to