On Wednesday 16 December 2009, Phil Smith wrote: > As Hawkeye said in the Second City version of Last of the Mohicans, "Me > lie, big deal". Turns out I'd munged the path and have been using 2.6 all > this time. Upgrading to 2.8 *did* make a *huge* difference, like 60% or so. > Cow-orker had lied when he said he'd upgraded :-( > > Thanks!
Cool, so it works ok now for you ? Alex > ...phsiii > -----Original Message----- > From: Alexander Neundorf [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 3:28 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: Phil Smith > Subject: Re: [CMake] Builds slow as they go > > On Thursday 19 November 2009, Phil Smith wrote: > > Our build is on the order of 400 modules. It starts off very briskly and > > You mean like 400 targets, where the later ones depend on the earlier ones > ? Maybe there's a lot of dependency scanning going on. > Did you try cmake 2.8.0 ? This got faster there. > Another option would of course be to try to reduce the dependencies. > > Alex _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
