On Jan 21, 2010, at 10:22 AM, Jed Brown wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:17:22 -0600, Mark Moll <mm...@cs.rice.edu> wrote:
>> You *can* use the Fortran BLAS/LAPACK libraries with C/C++ code.
>
> Yes, this is actually very common, but check_fortran_function_exists
> works by trying to link an actual Fortran program. When calling from C,
> you have to know how Fortran names are mangled which means testing a
> number of common choices. Nobody put this logic into these Find
> modules, but it would be nice because many (most?) users of BLAS/Lapack
> need to call it from both Fortran and C so they need to know how the
> symbols are mangled. CBLAS/CLapack are entirely different beasts, but I
> know of far more C projects that call the Fortran versions directly than
> use the C bindings.
Wouldn’t it be possible to use “nm” to detect the Fortran name mangling? For
example:
On OS X, default LAPACK library:
> nm /usr/lib/liblapack.dylib | grep cheev$ | awk '{print $3}’
_cheev
On Linux, using MKL:
> nm /opt/intel/Compiler/11.1/056/mkl/lib/em64t/libmkl_intel_lp64.a | grep
> cheev$ | awk '{print $3}'
cheev
(Of course the “grep” and “awk” commands can be replaced with some cmake string
commands, if you want to make it a bit more portable.)
--
Mark
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
