Hmmm, SCCS seems a bit unusable, especially for noobs. Based on this post http://www.newt.com/scm/rcs-sccs, I suggest we move to RCS.
One question: what is this thing called a "3.5 inch floppy"? Happy 4/1/10 On 4/1/10 6:18 AM, "Bill Hoffman" <[email protected]> wrote: > After trying git for a while, the CMake developers have decided that git > is way too complicated, and allows too many edits to take place > simultaneously. So, we have decided to use sccs instead. With sccs, > only one developer at a time can change a file, this avoids conflicting > edits to being made to the source tree, and should increase the > stability of CMake. Since there are no network protocols supported by > sccs, we will have to use a single SAMBA share to host the repository. > Since we can not export this share outside Kitware, only developers > located in the Clifton Park office of Kitware will be able to checkout a > file for edit. If external developers need to change a file, they will > have to email one of the CMake developers and ask them to check it out > locally at Kitware. Once the CMake dev gets a lock on the file, we will > email that version to the outside contributor. After changes are made, > the file should be emailed back to Kitware, or sent on a 3.5 inch floppy > disk to: > > CMake SCCS revisions at Kitware > 28 Corporate Drive > Clifton Park, NY 12065 > > The change will happen today and today only. > > -Bill > > -- Daniel Blezek, PhD Medical Imaging Informatics Innovation Center P 127 or (77) 8 8886 T 507 538 8886 E [email protected] Mayo Clinic 200 First St. S.W. Harwick SL-44 Rochester, MN 55905 mayoclinic.org _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
