But they are not failing on dashmacmini4.kitware. My point is that we need to be using and testing as many viable configurations as possible BEFORE "older" configurations become obsolete. IMHO, encouraging the widest possible adoption of the "newer" configurations helps in this effort.
Even with carefully engineered regression tests, some latent "bugs" are only discovered during widespread deployment. By discovering those issues before they are on the critical path, we can lessen the "crisis" impact of the OS evolution. Richard On May 6, 2010, at 11:54 AM, Sean McBride wrote: > On Thu, 6 May 2010 11:45:21 -0500, Richard Wackerbarth said: > >> See RogueResearch6 and Chameleon00.NFSNet. >> Both of these machines are reporting errors for some time. > > The failing 'Architecture' test on Rogue6 fails on _both_ 32 and 64 bit > though. _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
