On 5/6/10, Bill Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: > On 5/6/2010 12:59 PM, Jed Brown wrote: > > > > Rebuilding with modified Tupfiles is not a problem, and will only build > > what is necessary. But: > > > > Tup doesn't support generating the Tupfiles themselves from other > > programs. If you do that, you would need to run a separate program to > > generate them before running 'tup upd'. I would hope that tup is > > expressive enough that you don't feel the need to generate the > > Tupfiles, though. > > > > > http://groups.google.com/group/tup-users/msg/2b16ad647bda6c7c > > > > > > Maybe this will change, preferably by coming up with a clean way to > > express the dependency. > > > > > That would be a serious problem. As folks would expect to be able to edit > a CMakeLists.txt file (the input to cmake), run tup, and have the right > stuff happen.
Is the normal mode of operation to run 'cmake' followed by 'make'? Do you not need to run 'cmake' ever again because 'make' is setup to re-create the Makefiles from CMakeLists.txt as appropriate? Does that work if you add new directories and such? Sorry for the noob questions - I'm still trying to learn how you expect things to work. -Mike _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
