On 5/28/2010 3:48 AM, Sebastian Meier wrote:
Hi Alex,
Hmm, if you plan to implement a makefile-based generator, why are all
those settings needed in the project file ?
I am not planning to implement a makefile-based generator. I just
chose cmExtraEclipseCDT4Generator as a starting point because it
seemed practical.
Do you think in this case - namely a generator that creates some
project files and doesn't need to generate a makefile - it would be
more appropriate to subclass cmLocalGenerator or cmGlobalGenerator or
both?
If you are not going to use makefiles, then you do not want to base it
on the eclipse generator. You want to start with cmLocalGenerator and
cmGlobalGenerator. Can NetBeans be driven from the command line? That
is a requirement for getting try_compile to work. You might want to
look at the VS 2010 generator as a model. It is the most recent one
done. It has a target generator which is a bit easier than the
local/global split of the older way of doing things.
-Bill
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
