Hi Chris
> No, you shouldn't have to, unless you're using in-source builds
> which is very strongly deprecated. Once you've gotten used to
> out-of-source builds you'll never want to go back.
Ok, I'm trying to think of how this would work for us.
The source for each of our libraries is in a separate subdirectory as you would
expect. The subdirectory structure is:
Subdir ----- .cpp files
|
|-- Makefile
|
|-- _gnuDebug <=== .o and .a files for Debug build
|
|-- _gnuRelease <=== .o and .a files for Release build
Would you call that an out-of-source build, or would you require the Makefile
to be in a 'Build' subdirectory below the source?
Or, would you really like to see the build files somewhere to the side of the
source files?
Best regards
David
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
