On 12/22/2010 6:08 PM, Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
I track "next" very closely.
I looks as if Brad added the -Wl, to both Darwin-GNU and to Darwin-icc.
If Bill Hoffman is correct and " The intel compiler does not want and can not have
the -Wl, syntax.", then there is a problem with one of Brad's two edits.
However, Bill Cochran should try "next" (or tonight's "nightly").
I do not have his compiler on any of my systems.
I was not correct. :)
However, I still say the bug is with mpicc as it is not handling the
flag correctly. The mac gcc does pass this flag to the linker without
the -Wl syntax. Both gcc and the intel compiler will accept the -Wl,
syntax so that is the safer way to go.
-Bill
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
