Am Tuesday 11 January 2011 schrub Eric Noulard: [...]
> in fact I think the "real" source for this is the fact the CPack lacks > the notion > of "EXTRA" distribution file which is available with autoconf, EXTRA_DIST > var > http://www.gnu.org/software/hello/manual/automake/Basics-of-Distribution.h > tml or the dist-hook: > http://www.gnu.org/software/hello/manual/automake/The-dist-Hook.html#The-di > st-Hook > > The fact is CPack doesn't know much about "source package" and > in fact it package source using the CPACK_INSTALLED_DIRECTORIES directory > list. (look at the generated CPackSourceConfig.cmake) > > I think you can "emulate" the extra thing of autoconf. > If you want ot package "more" than the source tree with > "package_source" you can try > the following in your main CMakeLists.txt (before include(CPack)) > > SET(CPACK_SOURCE_INSTALLED_DIRECTORIES > "${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR};/;${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/extra;/extra") > > then the content of the directory > ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/extra will added in the package source archive > inside "extra" dir. > > it should work. It does indeed work perfectly IFF I don't add CMAKE_BINARY_DIR to CPACK_SOURCE_IGNORE_FILES which is needed when someone creates a folder (let's say "build/") inside of the source dir and runs cmake from this folder which seems to be quite wide spread. Is it possible to have CPack somehow give more authority to CPACK_SOURCE_INSTALLED_DIRECTORIES than CPACK_SOURCE_IGNORE_FILES? Tobias
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
