What are you changing, and if what you're doing is valid, why not work to get it integrated with the main CMake development?
For better or worse we will be sticking with the official CMake releases. It's the devil we know. On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Clifford Yapp <[email protected]> wrote: > It's still being developed, but you might try the version in the > BRL-CAD subversion repository, cmake branch: > > svn co > https://brlcad.svn.sf.net/svnroot/brlcad/brlcad/branches/cmake/misc/CMake > brlcad_cmake > > I'm trying to get it as "bullet-proof" as possible, although I'm not > sure how well it will do in all situations yet. > > Cheers, > CY > > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:26 AM, kent williams > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I found this out on a RHEL6 machine, which comes stock with tclsh and >> wish but without the C header files for development. >> >> FindTCL.cmake sets TCL_FOUND, even though >> TCL_INCLUDE_PATH:PATH=TCL_INCLUDE_PATH-NOTFOUND >> >> Imagine the hilarity that ensues! > _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
