> As far as I correctly understood patch from Peter, implementation for > makefile dependency is on place. > For me makefile dependency is fine, since I'm using only makefiles. > > I just tried to understand idea of LANGUAGE inside cmake. I think that > in this particular case having new language on place is really good > idea. This is what for language was.
I will also vote for this solution. Since there is no difference in the workflow why to use separate macros and separate implementation. Why to not simply reuse LANG interface and C/CPP dependency scanner. The same analogy is in case of C and CXX - there is no distinguish like: c_add_executable and cxx_add_executable. regards, Tomasz Majchrowski. _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
