2011/7/25 Brad King <brad.k...@kitware.com>: > On 07/25/2011 12:00 PM, Daniel Pfeifer wrote: >> what is your opinion on the $<> syntax I originally proposed? >> This would not require creating virtual targets for header only libraries. > > The proposed solution is to use delayed evaluation to work around > lack of dependency-sorted ordering. The topological sort already > used by the Boost CMake solves this problem in a better way.
The topological sort function is not used anymore in Boost.CMake. Since we have circular dependencies, there is no chance in sorting the modules in dependency-sorted order. > The > ITK project already does CMake-time module dependency detection > and sorting using a similar approach. It correctly handles the > generation of include directories for each module. It also handles > header-only modules. Does it also handle circular dependencies? cheers, Daniel _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
