On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 03:33:01PM +0200, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:12:55 AM Andreas Mohr wrote: > > Depending on actual implementation of CMake (whether it has some caching > > logic or not), this might be woefully inefficient, > > causing a possibly _filesystem-bound_ file append for each line. > > Without checking, AFAIK it hasn't. > But, I never had the impression that this part of "make install" would be > slow, so I'm not sure it is worth it.
Yeah, I'm afraid it's not a hotpath, thus it's not necessarily worth optimizing. > Did you notice slow install behaviour ? No, it simply occurred to me that this construct might be a lot more inefficient than storing content of a helper array... One would probably have to analyse an strace trace (or some such) of a full install to be able to pinpoint specifics. Andreas Mohr _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
