On Wednesday 05 October 2011, Peter Kümmel wrote: > And here some numbers to compare it with Qt's qmake. > I've used this project: http://kst-plot.kde.org/ > which supports qmake and cmake. > > Running make/ninja on a fresh compiled project > with warm caches (in seconds): > > qmake cmake Ninja > Makefiles makefiles > > -j1 0.5-0.8 1.6-1.9 0.11-0.14 > -j2 0.6-0.8 1.3-1.4 0.11-0.13 > -j4 0.6-0.7 1.1-1.4 0.10-0.13 > > > Summary: > - Ninja is the fastest > - cmake Makefiles are really slow > - parallel jobs doesn't help much in this special case
and: - qmake makefiles don't have complete dependencies Seriously, if cmakes Makefiles are slower, I am very sure this is because they have complete dependencies. Alex -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
