Yes, it's partly EBCDIC, but I don't think that's actually an issue here. The compiler allows compiling both "in ASCII" (so constants are ASCII) and native (EBCDIC); we do some of both.
Good memory, btw! -----Original Message----- From: Alexander Neundorf [mailto:a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 2:03 PM To: cmake@cmake.org Cc: Phil Smith; David Cole; Janet Graff; Brad King; Bill Hoffman Subject: Re: [CMake] CMake still broken post-2.8.1 On Tuesday 25 October 2011, Phil Smith wrote: > No, alas. Code is proprietary and the compiler is licensed too. I think Phil asked here on the list like one year ago or so. So, there are some things to be found in the archive. Was this EBDIC stuff ? Alex -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
