On 6 December 2011 17:19, Alexander Neundorf <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday 06 December 2011, Mateusz Łoskot wrote: >> On 6 December 2011 16:27, Daniel Dekkers <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Dec 4, 2011, at 11:59 AM, Michael Jackson wrote: >> >> I think if the CMake community took a vote we could probably come up >> >> with an "Exemplar" Find*.cmake file that is good for someone trying to >> >> develop a new one. >> > >> > Yes please. >> > And I think in general that is true. Of course it is more interesting and >> > often more urgent to spend time on "exotic" problems. But there are >> > these basics that are missing in the documentation. >> >> It's a great idea and I've been suggesting and looking for best >> practices for long time: >> >> http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2010-March/035596.html >> >> I'd add also: >> >> Find*.cmake modules should be documented separately (separate >> chapters/pages) from the main documentation. The current documentation is >> already very long and navigating it has become difficult. > > Do you mean the book or the man/html pages ?
I meant the Web version: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/cmake-2-8-docs.html But, it turns I'm wrong, as the HTML version installed with CMake is well organised. For example, on Windows users get: %ProgramFiles%/CMake 2.8/doc/cmake-2.8/cmake-modules.html False complain, apologies. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org Member of ACCU, http://accu.org -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
