2012/3/6 David Cole <[email protected]>: > 2012/2/15 David Cole <[email protected]>: >> 2012/2/15 Nicolas Desprès <[email protected]> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Bill Hoffman <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 2/15/2012 11:04 AM, Peter Collingbourne wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:45:04AM -0500, Bill Hoffman wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> I note that Kitware has machines set up to run dashboards for the >>>>> Makefile generator. Is there any reason why some of those machines >>>>> can't be set up to run double duty as Ninja dashboards, especially >>>>> given that the work is only required once a day? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> >>>> No, we are going to set some up as well. Basically it is a human >>>> resource problem. One has to figure out how to build ninja and from where >>>> before a dashbaord can be setup. >>>> >>>> >>>> If someone out there is a ninja fan, a dashboard would be appreciated. >>>> >>> >>> Bill, >>> >>> If I give you a shell script that can be run by cron and that do the job, >>> could you add it to your build-farm? I know how to do all the bootstrapping >>> stuff. I just have never done any cdash integration/submission but with the >>> documentation you gave me I could probably write it but maybe not test it >>> except it there is a dashboard where I can test. I don't have my own >>> dashboard yet. >>> >>> >> >> Feel free to test right on the CMake dashboard itself. Arbitrary submissions >> that show up in the "Nightly" section or the "Experimental" section are ok >> with us. You don't need your own CDash server... In fact, we want you to >> send to ours. >> >> > > We are doing better here, but we still need a little improvement > before we merge the ninja generator branch into 'master' -- either > that, or we need to make a judgment call that says it's ok to have > this in master even though it's not completely polished yet. > > 2 things I'd like to see before we merge: > > (1) test failures corrected on the Mac Nightly Expected dashboards > submitting using the ninja generator
I am sorry but I did not manage to find the time to tackle them. Unfortunately, I am very busy at the moment. > (2) reliable dashboard submissions (even if not all tests pass) from a > Windows machine using the ninja generator > > We *could*, if popular demand is high enough, merge it in anyway and > call it "experimental" to start with, or we could get it right all the > way before we merge to 'master' and put it out in an official CMake > release. > > > Anybody have thoughts on this? > +1 for publishing I think it will boost up the development, bringing more people to work on it. Cheers, -- Nicolas Desprès -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
