On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Clifford Yapp <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:59 PM, David Cole <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hello CMake Ninja fans, > > > > We are going to be creating the CMake 2.8.8 final release tomorrow. > However, > > there are issues reported for the ninja generator. Does anybody consider > > them "showstoppers" ?? > > David, > > Does the latest CMake 2.8.8 source tree have this fix? > > http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2012-April/049772.html > > Even if it's not the ideal fix, I just tested it and it does seem to > address one of the ninja clean target issues I was seeing. Not really > a show-stopper (definitely not worth another RC, if that's what would > be involved) but would be a nice-to-have. > No -- that change is not in CMake's main repo yet. It is not in the 'release' branch, nor is it in master or next. > > CY > > P.S. - Is it expected that Ninja respect the > ADDITIONAL_MAKE_CLEAN_FILES property, or is there a separate property > for each generator? If the latter, is there some "common" property > that can be used to have all generators' clean rules remove the files? > I would expect this to work. The Ninja generator still needs some work before it hits 100% parity with the Unix Makefiles generator. -- > > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: > http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake >
-- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
