> The suggestion in the bug report looks somewhat reasonable to me, but then > again, we don't actually create separate debug info, and the 'Release' > configuration would be no different to the 'RelWithDebInfo' configuration, > so it's sort of a 'lie'. > > The real need for it though is probably that it allows the downstream of Qt > to use RelWithDebInfo themselves? > > The alternative way to do that would be to set the MAP_IMPORTED_CONFIG* > properties. I'm not sure whether I should advise that and close the bug > report, or should I implement the suggested change. > > Any ideas? > As a windows programmer who regularly uses CMake generated RelWithDebInfo targets with Qt4 since 2008 I believe the behavior of using the Release versions for RelWithDebugInfo is fine (and actually preferred for me). If I need to debug deeply into a Qt problem I will switch to use the Debug build however most of the time for itk or vtk I want to use RelWithDebInfo to debug since these tend to be slow to Debug in Debug mode that is when I use dicom images that are similar resolution to what my programs typically use.
John -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
