On Thursday 14 March 2013, Laszlo Papp wrote: > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Florian Reinhard < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > If ARM and DSP toolchain are commandline compatible, there could be an > > option to specify the architecture, like C6000 (DSP core in OMAP > > processors), C2000, C6400 which map to the correct > > compiler/linker/archiver/strip names. > > 1) Of course, TI for sure shares the language parser among the toolchains, > so do they with the interface. It would not make too much sense otherwise. > I bet it is only a historical issue why they do not use their binaries with > the same names. Note that, they already migrated from cl470.exe to > armcl.exe to be more generic across ARM cores. One step ahead could be that > they even merge that with the DSP toolchain binaries in the future with a > relevant target option, or perhaps not. It is not a biggie after all. > > 2) I am not sure an option is a good idea. In fact, you need to specify the > compiler executable (path) in your toolchain file, and once you specify > that, the other executables match the naming schema quite well to be > logical what their name would be.
the TI_DSP_to_TI branch on cmake stage now tries to automatically detect the compiler prefix and suffix and searches ar and strip accordingly. It seems to work for me (but I can't run the binaries). Please verify that it works, so I can still get it into 2.8.11 hopefully. Thanks Alex -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
