2013/3/18 Laszlo Papp <[email protected]>: > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Florian Reinhard > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> In addition compilers upto 7.2 did not support anything else than coff >> abi. So i don't see any valid reason to add --abi=eabi. Even more you >> usually set your silicon for improved optimizer results with e.g >> set_target_properties(myTarget PROPERTIES COMPILE_FLAGS "-mv6740") >> and i see no reason not to add --abi=eabi there if one needs it. > > > Well, EABI will most likely be upcoming as the default in the new TI > versions. It will make no sense to use such an old legacy stuff mostly > incompatible with the majority of the rest. > > Also, 7.2 was released a quite while ago, more than 2 years. If one still > uses that version, that is likely a call for troubles. Texas Instruments > discourage that, at least in our case, anyhow. > > By the way, Qt will have the EABI by default instead of the COFFABI. Here > you can see the progress for that: > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,51173 > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,51233 > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,51228 > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,51078 > > ... and more to come. > > Laszlo >
I still don't see that this is a valid reason to break things for others. -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
