TBH, I do not see the "PRIVATE dependencies are made PUBLIC for the
purposes of linking when the dependent is static library" there.

-- 
Ivan Shapovalov / intelfx /


On 2016-08-16 at 02:35 -0500, Nicholas Braden wrote:
> Yes, the behavior is documented in several places, the most prominent
> being here:
> https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/manual/cmake-buildsystem.7.html#t
> ransitive-usage-requirements
> 
> 
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 9:22 PM, Ivan Shapovalov <inte...@intelfx.nam
> e> wrote:
> > 
> > On 2016-08-15 at 21:46 -0400, Guillaume Dumont wrote:
> > > 
> > > As far as I know the PRIVATE
> > > keyword
> > > should have no effect on transitive linking when foo is static
> > > and we
> > > call:
> > > 
> > > target_link_libraries(foo PRIVATE bar)
> > > 
> > > Hope this helps.
> > 
> > Wow. I did not know that. Should've tested on sample project.
> > It does not solve include path bloat though, but that's a minor
> > issue.
> > 
> > One question remains... is this behavior documented somewhere?
> > 
> > Anyway, huge thanks,
> > --
> Ivan Shapovalov / intelfx /

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 

Powered by www.kitware.com

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more 
information on each offering, please visit:

CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Reply via email to