Thank you, Rena.

That's exactly the answer to my question, (although not necessarily the one I was hoping for.)  ;-)
 
Holly
 
 
Holly F. Sox, RN, RAC-C 
Clinical Editor, Careplans.com
www.careplans.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: Stop the Stereotypes/More Antipsych stuff

As a standard of practice, it would not be appropriate for a facility to develop a policy to delay implementation of a category of physician orders.  The facility may adopt a policy developed in conjunction with the medical director that outlines the components that the order should contain.  The nurses who receive the orders - either via T.O. or in person at the nurses station - should be trained to read the order before contact with the physician is broken (either before the nurse hangs up the phone or before the physician leaves the facility) and to obtain any needed clarifications on the spot.  This should occur for all orders, not just psychotropic meds.

Rena

Rena R. Shephard, MHA, RN, FACDONA, RAC-C
Chair, American Association of Nurse Assessment Coordinators
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subj: Re: Stop the Stereotypes/More Antipsych stuff
Date: 12/16/03 6:39:28 PM Pacific Standard Time
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent from the Internet



Very true, Glo.  And I am sorry if my original post sparked any anti-surveyor sentiments. Once again, for the record, I was just trying to get some confirmation about whether it is "acceptable" or "legal" to have a policy of not initiating a new antipsychotic medication until the MD has given an appropriate diagnosis.  Our docs have been using depression and agitation, and then get snarky with me when I try to clarify.  Seems as though it would be easier to have it on paper, saying, "Dear Doctor. Your order for Risperdal for Resident Sally Swearsalot has been noted. In order to begin this medication, please indicate the appropriate diagnosis from the list below.  Regulations require that one of these diagnoses be present in order to justify use of this med."

 
Thanks, y'all, for bearing with me.  I am just trying to understand this.
 
Holly F. Sox, RN, RAC-C 
Clinical Editor, Careplans.com
www.careplans.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

----- Original Message -----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:27 PM
Subject: Re: Stop the Stereotypes


It is true some surveyors are very and some are not. However, it is my understanding that they are not allowed to give advice per the Federal govt. I believe it is stated in the State operations manual. Gloglo





Reply via email to