This brings up one of the concepts that I believe will someday be an issue in nursing homes and psychiatric facilities. We all know of physical restraints...Particularly in psych facilities we know of chemical restraints. What about the idea of a psychological restraint? As an extreme example, what if the alarm were loud enough to hurt the residents ears. After a few times of this occuring, the resident would not get out of the chair in order to avoid the noise. I consider that not only a quality of life issue, but a form of psychological restraint. It does in fact prevent the resident from rising, but not in a physical way, but in a psychological one. This is not currently recognized as a restraint, but I believe it will be someday.



Nathan Lake, RN, MSHA

 

 

 

----Original Message Follows----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Clarification on restraints
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:35:39 -0600
Then the situation of a resident with an alarm sounding, repeatedly told
to sit down, is not a restraint but probably a quality of life issue.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 10:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Clarification on restraints
Bed and chair alarms and other wanderguard systems are not restraints
according to the RAI manual definition.  The following Q&A was part of
the Q&A set from CMS in May 2002.
"5-89. Please clarify the use of chair and bed alarms. Example: Resident
placed in chair with chair alarm, resident stands up and attempts to
ambulate and alarm sounds. Staff intervenes and places resident back in
chair every time alarm signals. This seems to be restricting movement.
Is this then considered a restraint?
"The alarm is not restricting the resident's freedom of movement. Unless
the attachment of the alarm cannot be removed easily and restricts the
resident's freedom of movement or normal access to one's body, the alarm
device would not meet the definition of a restraint. In either case,
there is not a category on the MDS 2.0 to code chair or bed alarms. The
use of these devices should be documented on the medical record and in
the care plan."
Although this explanation hasn't made it into the RAI User's Manual,
there is no reason to believe that CMS' position has changed.  I believe
that wanderguard systems would fall into this same category.
Rena
Rena R. Shephard, MHA, RN, FACDONA, RAC-C
Chair, American Association of Nurse Assessment Coordinators
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: Clarification on restraints
Date: 1/9/04 8:08:04 PM Pacific Standard Time
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent from the Internet
We did recieve a tag regarding Wandergaurd bracelets one time because
she had not been assessed for restraint reduction..it was considered a
restraint because she was unable to remove it
I think if one physically makes a person sit down after an alarm sounds
then they have just been restrained and there should be a place to code
such because residents are physically restrained in such manner daily
----- Original Message -----
From: sheppard70057rn
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 6:47 AM
Subject: Fw: Clarification on restraints
Dawn Sheppard, RN, CRNAC
----- Original Message -----
2 areas come up frequently as a question that I cannot find on the CMS
site-
1. chair alarms and bed alarms- are they restraints? we heard at an MDS
seminar in Texas that a resident who gets conditioned to the sound of
the alarm and sat back down when the alarm sounded-we would have to code
as a restraint-
2. wander guard bracelets-are they restraints? although the resident is
free to move within the facility- it does prevent them from leaving-so
how would we code those?
Here are two questions that have been posed to me.  The first one I
would not believe it is a restraint but the second one gets you
wondering.  Here is the thing:  IN the definition in the RAI manual
about restraints it states "restricts freedom of movement".   What is
freedom of movement?  Because technically a wanderguard would restrict
freedom of movement from inside to the outside.  But if you are saying
freedom of movement of their body then no it does not restrict that.
BUT if that is what it means thenit brings you to siderails.  Siderails
just restrict  movement from one surface to the next, they do not
restrict the resident's freedom of movement of their body.
Any comments are greatly apppreciated.
Dawn .


Find out everything you need to know about Las Vegas here for that getaway. /---------------------------------------------------------- The Case Mix Discussion Group is a free service of the American Association of Nurse Assessment Coordinators "Committed to the Assessment Professional" Be sure to visit the AANAC website. Accurate answers to your questions posted to NAC News and FAQs. For more info visit us at http://www.aanac.org -----------------------------------------------------------/

Reply via email to