Re: SCSA mds or not?

[RRS2000]

When a resident is going to be gone more than 10-14 day I usually suggest doing the Discharge Return not anticipated even if you expect the resident back. Several years ago (I don't remember exactly when) HCFA came out with guidance (not a written reg)  that a resident gone more than that time period should be considered to have been finally discharged. Just to be clear - this has never been formalized and is not a part of current CMS policy. When a resident is expected to return to the facility (the physician or resident/family has not stated that the resident will not be returning), the  Discharge-Return Anticipated is the correct tracking code.  With a Discharge-Return Anticipated, regardless of the time period the resident is out of the facility, upon his or her return, a new Admission assessment is not required nor is it necessary, since the resident would be assessed upon return to the facility to determine if a Significant Change in Status Assessment is required. If a resident was discharged with return anticipated and the facility determines that the resident will not be returning or has died, the facility has the option to complete another discharge tracking form with the code Return Not Anticipated.  Though it is not required, it keeps the records tidy. See page 2-24 of the RAI User's Manual as well as the Discharge and Reentry Flowchart on page 2-26 for requirements pertaining to these tracking forms. Rena Rena R. Shephard, MHA, RN, FACDONA, RAC-C Chair, American Association of Nurse Assessment Coordinators [EMAIL PROTECTED]