But look at page 212 -- he gives exactly the case we were talking about and uses 2 beams for 1/9. The earlier case is made simple by leaving the discussion in terms of fancy meters with simple quarter note divisions, so there 9 is clearly 9:2 in our thinking (and not problematic). Also it irks me that he thinks he can smirk at Ives -- the bastard!
_______________________________________________ Cmdist mailing list [email protected] http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
