I managed to get CM and many subsystems working on the
"experimental" version of SBCL for Windows. I was hoping that RTS
would work,
that is good news, thanks
but I don't know how to make a "librts.dll".
me either!
What are the chances that we'll see RTS working on this platform
soon? :-)
none if you leave it to me. i dont have access to a windows machine.
the next problem would be getting a c compiler, then fighting sbcl,
which would need to have callbacks working for there to be any
chance. if there are callbacks then it might work. for example rts
does work on linux sbcl (at least in the sbcl version i was using...)
but not on my darwin sbcl. i think todd (may) have it working on
tiger with sbcl. but as you see its hit and miss. it would definatly
take someone that knows what they are doing on windows and sbcl to
tackle this and im not that person, sorry.
i think i did my part - we spent alot of time writing a good posix c
scheduler with a vanilla lisp side using straight-ahead cffi and
common lisp. if it doesnt work in a particular lisp or os there is
nothing i can do about it at this point
best,
rick
On Jul 13, 2006, at 7:50 PM, Niklas Kambeitz wrote:
I managed to get CM and many subsystems working on the
"experimental" version of SBCL for Windows. I was hoping that RTS
would work, but I don't know how to make a "librts.dll".
What are the chances that we'll see RTS working on this platform
soon? :-)
Nik
_______________________________________________
Cmdist mailing list
[email protected]
http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
_______________________________________________
Cmdist mailing list
[email protected]
http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
