Great to hear about anything that will make using CM on XP easier!
I personally would LOVE to get OSC working as there is now a hack that will allow OSC messages to control ableton live. I personally would love to control ableton Live from CM. So count my vote in for the OSC system load hack. Here is a link if you are curious: http://www.liveapi.org/ On 6/14/07, Rick Taube <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ok i see it uses a thread to receive. however if you didnt require receiving anything from chuck, it should be possible to WRITE Osc messages if i hack the system loading. if this is worth it to you let me know. in the near futire there may be at least a partial solution to this xp-is-always-the-wilderness issue with respect to cm, but i cant say much about it at this point. > rts uses the posix threads package. if there is a posix threads > package on xp you can, in principal, run rts in your lisp. however > it would also require that your lisp allow callbacks from a foreign > thread. i dont know if clisp will allow this or not (my guess would > be no). but im not really sure why osc would requires the rts > package since its just socket communication, maybe the docs are > misinformed. ill take a look later today i cant rememeber any of > this anymore! >> Hello, i'm new to CM. I'm working with WinXP and i have two >> questions: >> >> 1) Does OSC work on WinXP with CLISP? >> >> The documentation on the CM homepage is not clear about this. The >> configuration matrix shows that it is possible (H) but when i look >> at the OSC documentation it says that the real time scheduler >> (RTS) is necessary for OSC but, according to the configuration >> matrix, RTS is not supported under XP.(I want to use OSC for >> communicating with Chuck). >> _______________________________________________ Cmdist mailing list [email protected] http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
_______________________________________________ Cmdist mailing list [email protected] http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
