i used to use vanilla emacs(with slime) + clisp + cm on my xp machine, but that was before the sbcl port took off. that worked quite well. if you want to use a scheme backend though, well thats a fair bit more difficult. the best results i had with scheme was from installing guile via cygwin.
btw, this was all 6-8 months ago so things may be different now. cheers, James On 8/31/07, Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Forgive me, folks. I suddenly have the use of a fast > Win XP machine - whereas I alread have CM + Slime > + Emacs up and running on my old Linux box. > > So I am looking at, > http://commonmusic.sourceforge.net/doc/cm.html > > and would like to ask - how does Common Music best > work on an XP machine ? Which Emacs ? > > I would guess Xemacs, Common Lisp, Common Music, > (but with no CM Realtime or graphs). > > Can anyone please provide a thumbnail sketch of the > components or setup I should be looking at ? > > _______________________________________________ > Cmdist mailing list > [email protected] > http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist > _______________________________________________ Cmdist mailing list [email protected] http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
