Im sorry i havent had any time the last few days for answering anything. ill try to get to this later today.
On May 23, 2008, at 6:22 AM, Uğur Güney wrote: > http://pinhead.music.uiuc.edu/~hkt/grace/doc/cm.html#sprout > > # I thought about this, and want to ask whether a new thread is > created for every sprout command. If so maybe it is hard for the > computer to create a new thread every 0.5 seconds with good > synchronization. > # I changed the code such that instead of using a process inside a > process for random selection of what to output at every beat, I put a > loop in the place of inner process. In this way there is only one > process and hence there is not any synchronization problem. > > (define-process (ritim2 n tempo) > (run with > patdur = (make-cycle '(.1 .05 .1 .05 .05)) and > pattimes = (make-weighting '((1 10) (2 2) (3 1))) and > rate = (/ (/ 60 tempo) 4) > repeat n > do > (loop > with times = (next pattimes) > with dur = (next patdur) > for i from 0 below times by 1 > do > (send "cs:i" 1 (* i (/ rate times)) dur)) > (wait rate))) > > (sprout (ritim2 100 120) 0 1) > (stop 1) > > > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Uğur Güney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> # In the (send) case, the timing is correct. Sounds are produced in >> constant time intervals. But in the (sprout (one-note...)) case they >> come in irregular intervals. > > _______________________________________________ > Cmdist mailing list > [email protected] > http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist _______________________________________________ Cmdist mailing list [email protected] http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
