> > I think I can implement this, but it will mean that if the macro is > not defined at read time, it will be expanded at eval time.
that would allow both to happen. > is expanded when it is evaluated. I think handling it instead > in the reader is easier than splicing its result into the caller > at eval time (not sure how much this will slow down the reader). whatever is easier! im happy to pay the price one time (at read time) to avoid it happening every time at eval time. ottherwise ill get rid of some of my macros since they werent intended to be run each time the function runs (like my optkey arg parsing) so for me id much rather pay the piper when the system boots rahter when people are calling things under processes! _______________________________________________ Cmdist mailing list [email protected] http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
