maybe a ./configure --with-cltl-compatability option would allow people to have it or not? personally im happy without it since the built-in behavior is already pretty close and i have the loop macro. ive even gotten used to the (do () ) abomination (still often wish for do* )
i will be teaching with clm next semester, there will be plenty of optimization requests at that point! On Jan 3, 2010, at 8:13 AM, Bill Schottstaedt wrote: >> bill is (was?) optimizing it > > yes yes! Send me hints! Also, I'm very interested in a CL- > compatibility > package -- every now and then a fit comes over me and I start writing > all the CL sequence functions. > > _______________________________________________ > Cmdist mailing list > [email protected] > http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist _______________________________________________ Cmdist mailing list [email protected] http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
