On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:52:57PM -0700, Bill Schottstaedt wrote: > David Lindes says he would like to work on the CL version of CLM, > > "from adding example usage information, to documentation, to > perhaps cleaning up certain warnings that I get, making it > quicklisp-friendly... whatever." > > but he prefers git/github, about which I know nothing. I have no > plans to develop the CL CLM, so surely this is a good thing?
Oh, marvelous! Yes, git is definitely the way to go. Thanks Ralf Mattes > I sent him this email: > > > Hi! I'm flattered that you're interested in CLM. I stopped working on > the Lisp side of that code about 10 years ago because it was too > painful to debug anything through the Lisp FFI's of that time (sbcl in > particular was a nightmare). But I've continued fixing any bugs that > people report. My real effort since has been in C/Scheme (sndclm.html in the > Snd package). Since the sndlib portion is shared, I always test the CL > stuff whenever sndlib changes. The other CL program from that era is CMN, > also more-or-less comatose, but also maintained ever since. > > I don't know anything about git or github -- any info you might want to > pass along would be welcome. I'm certainly open to your suggestion, > and would like to avoid sourceforge, if possible (I assume github is > something else). I'll ask the other CLM/CMN users what they prefer. > > _______________________________________________ > Cmdist mailing list > [email protected] > http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist _______________________________________________ Cmdist mailing list [email protected] http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
