On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:17:09PM +0100, anders.vin...@bek.no wrote:
>
> R> I think that's not really a viable solution. At least libcelt
> R> isn't even currently available in Debian stable/testing.
>
> Then i guess your libjack doesnt need it?
This is the Debian-provided libjack:
ldd /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libjack.so.0
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007fff6afe8000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0
(0x00007fec6650a000)
libopus.so.0 => /usr/lib/libopus.so.0 (0x00007fec662c3000)
librt.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librt.so.1 (0x00007fec660ba000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x00007fec65eb6000)
libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
(0x00007fec65bb3000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x00007fec658b4000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1
(0x00007fec6569e000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007fec652f2000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fec669c6000)
> The jack-api in use in OM is very simple, and doesnt rely on anything
> outside jack.h
>
> R> BTW, any chance to get a 64bit version?
>
> If you provide me with a 'enterprise'-license for lw (= 3 times the
> price of the 'pro'-license :-/ )
Yeah, tell me. I was _almost: buying a LW Licence, until I saw that huge price
tag on the 64bit version. 64bit == Enterpise, that's so 1990ish ;-)
> R> I'm not shure a 32bit libjack will play nicely with a 64bit
> R> jackd.
>
> It usually does. What troubles do you see?
None, since I couldn't get OM to run without libcelt. I just speculated, since
libjack and jack need to work as a pair (i.e. jackd and libjack need to match)
and from toying with jack on ARN I know that there are some struct packing
issues.
Cheers, RalfD
> _______________________________________________
> Cmdist mailing list
> Cmdist@ccrma.stanford.edu
> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
_______________________________________________
Cmdist mailing list
Cmdist@ccrma.stanford.edu
http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
