Oh, I have been missing something: "[..] and set! evaluates its second argument, so [..]"
I now realize that to see get the behavior I was going after I needed to (apply set! 'x (quote 'bar) ()) I guess it's not inconsistent at all, I just completely missed the double evaluation going on with the 2nd argument. Thanks for the thorough explanation & sorry for the wrong alarm! On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 at 00:12, <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe it's inconsistent with (apply + a b) where > there's only one evaluation of a and b? Hmmm. > >
_______________________________________________ Cmdist mailing list [email protected] https://cm-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
