|
I'm looking for articles, design rationales or comments explaining why Common Music switched from the Common Lisp to the Scheme based implementation.
As far as I've read the past publications, object-orientation (i.e. CLOS) has been an important aspect of the Common Music composition approach. Scheme is quite different from Common Lisp, so apparently Common Music made quite a paradigm shift from version 2 to 3.
What was the motivation for this? Have the expectations associated with this change been fulfilled in retrospective?
Another question: is there a formal specification of SAL somewhere (EBNF, language report, or the like)?
Thanks
R.K. | |
_______________________________________________
Cmdist mailing list
[email protected]
https://cm-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
