Thank you for sharing,Peg! Great information!

Sent from my iPad

On Jun 1, 2011, at 6:17 AM, [email protected] wrote:

>   Today's Topic Summary
> Group: http://groups.google.com/group/cmlhope/topics
> 
> Prayers For Zavie Miller [4 Updates]
> PCR BCR-ABL Results [2 Updates]
> Zavie [1 Update]
>  Topic: Prayers For Zavie Miller
> Barry <[email protected]> May 31 01:50PM -0700 ^
>  
> My thoughts and best wishes to Zavie and his family. Barry Cooper
>  
>  
> 
> Martin Gartenberg <[email protected]> May 31 11:16PM -0400 ^
>  
> Hi Rob and the rest of the group,
>  
> I have known Zavie for many years and speak, Skype or email to either him or
> his wife Ida several times a week. I am actually number one on his zero
> list. I did speak with Ida this morning and she told me that Zavie is
> talking and understanding everything but has some weakness on his left side
> which is understandable for what he went through. *He is not paralized* and
> is still in a lot of pain from his legs but that will be dealt with later
> on. The main thing is that Zavie is a very strong fighter and he is still
> here with us.
>  
> Yes Rob, it is always one breath at a time, and celabrating small victories.
> We all have.
>  
> When I hear anything new I will post them.
>  
> Marty Gartenberg
>  
>  
> 
> Rob <[email protected]> May 31 11:04PM -0500 ^
>  
> Marty,
>  
> That sounds encouraging. I hope Zavie will continue to make progress.
>  
> Rob
>  
>  
> 
> [email protected] Jun 01 12:08AM -0400 ^
>  
> Thanks so much for the update Rob. Very helpful and hopeful. We are all 
> pulling for him. Beth
>  
> 
>  Topic: PCR BCR-ABL Results
> peg <[email protected]> May 31 11:54AM -0700 ^
>  
> Friends,
>  
> I do not post very often here any more, ever since I discovered that
> when my name, e-mail address, etc is google searched, all my posts
> here, that I thought were private, are revealed to the world, possibly
> outing me to those I would not choose to give personal info to, such
> as business associates. I do still monitor the site though and will
> often respond privately to old friends.
>  
> However, a recent posting regarding PCR BCR-ABL testing caught my
> attention and seemed important enough to address to all.
>  
> PCR's are affected by many variables, including but not limited to
> labs holding blood samples too long before processing. RNA, which is
> what the PCR looks at in the blood, has a lability problem, and
> degrades within hours of the draw. It can genderally cause an
> erroneous low reading at anything past 36-48 hours. Everyone agrees
> that the best results will be on blood used within 24-36 hours of the
> time it is drawn. However, many labs will hold the blood far longer
> that 36 hours, sometimes up to 72 before processing. While this is
> alright with some testing, it is not with PCR's! Once the RNA
> degrades you will get a false low reading, even a false zero/PCRU.
>  
> I am sharing this because it is important to understand that if you
> get a PCR that is low (or zero) and the next one is elevated
> again...this may mean absolutely nothing, if the low PCR was an
> erroneous low!
>  
> Here is what is important to remember:
> 1) You should pick one lab and stick with it, since interpretation and
> protocol will vary from one lab to the next.
> 2) You should never get your blood drawn on a day, such as a Friday,
> when it will not be able to be tested the next day (unless your lab
> runs PCR's on Sat.).
> 3) You should verify that your lab does not save cost by holding
> samples until they have many from many patients. It is better to know
> what day the lab actually does PCR's and have your blood drawn the day
> before.
> 4) You should always inquire what date and time the PCR was actually
> run, and not just the draw date and reporting date. If it is greater
> that 36 hours after the draw it is probably inaccurate, the greater
> the time, the greater the inaccuracy.
> 5) MOST IMPORTANT - Do not consider any one PCR valid...but rather
> look at the results of two consecutive ones, if you have two that are
> both trending downward, this is good, if you have two that are
> trending upward, maybe bad.
>  
> An extreme low in the middle of a downward trend, then one that is
> higher (but still the same or lower than two PCR's ago) does not
> necessarily mean that you have lost therapy control, it could simply
> mean that the extreme low was erroneous. Unless you are in blast
> crisis nothing is going to change quickly, so don't panic. This is the
> time to take a deep breath and wait for the next PCR, which may show
> that you are still trending in a good direction, if you take the one
> erroneous low out of the equation.
>  
> This type of error happens more often that doctors and patients
> realize, and often pushes people into hasty and needless changes in
> therapy. I know, it happened to me! Because of that I did a lot of
> research, consulted with smart people, and picked a new lab that runs
> it within 24 hours. Hope this helps ease some minds and arm everyone
> with some good info. Remember, if CML is the bus, you are still the
> driver and you should expect your docs to help navagate, not drive!
> Knowledge is the key!
>  
> Keep the faith, peg
>  
> 
> Emile Fichault <[email protected]> May 31 09:03PM -0400 ^
>  
> Very interesting , good information .
> The first time pcr explain like that .
> Thank you very much .
> Emile
> no 527 Zavie's Club
>  
> -----Message d'origine----- 
> From: peg 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 2:54 PM 
> To: CMLHope 
> Subject: [CMLHope] PCR BCR-ABL Results 
>  
> Friends,
>  
> I do not post very often here any more, ever since I discovered that
> when my name, e-mail address, etc is google searched, all my posts
> here, that I thought were private, are revealed to the world, possibly
> outing me to those I would not choose to give personal info to, such
> as business associates. I do still monitor the site though and will
> often respond privately to old friends.
>  
> However, a recent posting regarding PCR BCR-ABL testing caught my
> attention and seemed important enough to address to all.
>  
> PCR's are affected by many variables, including but not limited to
> labs holding blood samples too long before processing. RNA, which is
> what the PCR looks at in the blood, has a lability problem, and
> degrades within hours of the draw. It can genderally cause an
> erroneous low reading at anything past 36-48 hours. Everyone agrees
> that the best results will be on blood used within 24-36 hours of the
> time it is drawn. However, many labs will hold the blood far longer
> that 36 hours, sometimes up to 72 before processing. While this is
> alright with some testing, it is not with PCR's! Once the RNA
> degrades you will get a false low reading, even a false zero/PCRU.
>  
> I am sharing this because it is important to understand that if you
> get a PCR that is low (or zero) and the next one is elevated
> again...this may mean absolutely nothing, if the low PCR was an
> erroneous low!
>  
> Here is what is important to remember:
> 1) You should pick one lab and stick with it, since interpretation and
> protocol will vary from one lab to the next.
> 2) You should never get your blood drawn on a day, such as a Friday,
> when it will not be able to be tested the next day (unless your lab
> runs PCR's on Sat.).
> 3) You should verify that your lab does not save cost by holding
> samples until they have many from many patients. It is better to know
> what day the lab actually does PCR's and have your blood drawn the day
> before.
> 4) You should always inquire what date and time the PCR was actually
> run, and not just the draw date and reporting date. If it is greater
> that 36 hours after the draw it is probably inaccurate, the greater
> the time, the greater the inaccuracy.
> 5) MOST IMPORTANT - Do not consider any one PCR valid...but rather
> look at the results of two consecutive ones, if you have two that are
> both trending downward, this is good, if you have two that are
> trending upward, maybe bad.
>  
> An extreme low in the middle of a downward trend, then one that is
> higher (but still the same or lower than two PCR's ago) does not
> necessarily mean that you have lost therapy control, it could simply
> mean that the extreme low was erroneous. Unless you are in blast
> crisis nothing is going to change quickly, so don't panic. This is the
> time to take a deep breath and wait for the next PCR, which may show
> that you are still trending in a good direction, if you take the one
> erroneous low out of the equation.
>  
> This type of error happens more often that doctors and patients
> realize, and often pushes people into hasty and needless changes in
> therapy. I know, it happened to me! Because of that I did a lot of
> research, consulted with smart people, and picked a new lab that runs
> it within 24 hours. Hope this helps ease some minds and arm everyone
> with some good info. Remember, if CML is the bus, you are still the
> driver and you should expect your docs to help navagate, not drive!
> Knowledge is the key!
>  
> Keep the faith, peg
>  
> 
>  Topic: Zavie
> Cindy Lewis <[email protected]> May 31 12:42PM -0700 ^
>  
> Hi,
> Thoughts and prayers going up for Zavie and his family!  His "Zero Club" gave 
> me such inspiration in my first year of CML.  Striving to get that Zero Club 
> membership number was such a great goal and kept me going.  I'm sure many 
> others feel the same way!  I've told my doctors about it along the way and 
> they have all been impressed!  Here's to Zavie - recover quickly, my friend!
> Cindy
> Zero Club Member 190 and still Zero since 2000!
>  
> Cindy Lewis
> [email protected]
>  
> 
> -- 
> [CMLHope]
> A support group of http://cmlhope.com
> -------------------------------------------------
>  
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "CMLHope" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/CMLHope

-- 
[CMLHope]
A support group of http://cmlhope.com
-------------------------------------------------

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CMLHope" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/CMLHope

Reply via email to