Alex,

I'm not sure if it is possible to not install them,
but the setup we've found works best in terms of
developer isolation, common codebase is to have
everything installed locally for each developer except
for the database which we share.

We then store all code in sourcesafe and use a naming
convention for testing channels in the database for
each solution.

This way we have different solutions and projects for
different areas of functionality, these are checked
out by developers in sourcesafe and the 'rule' is that
you only use the test channels for the solution you
have checked out.

cheers

mmmmmRob
--- Alex Lakeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm new to this list and hoping someone with more
> experience than I can
> answer this (I've tried the MS newsgroups but can't
> get a straight answer).
> 
> I have Content Management Server 2002 installed on a
> remote server and am
> trying to develop from my PC. It seems that to be
> able to develop a CMS2002
> site each developer needs to have CMS2002 on their
> local machine to get the
> VS.NET developer tools needed (e.g. Template
> Browser). Are you aware if this
> is the
> case?
> 
> Alex Lakeland
> 
> P.S. I'm not a vendor, just a developer straying
> into the big bad world of
> CMS products
> --
> http://cms-list.org/
> trim your replies for good karma.


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive greatest hits videos
http://launch.yahoo.com/u2
--
http://cms-list.org/
trim your replies for good karma.

Reply via email to