I would like to add and retract some comments concerning the post of mine contenting Joseph's point of view.
I wrote. > Joseph wrote: >>Look at content freshness. I'll use a news publishing example. For the >>sake of discussion, let's say a particular CMS provides the ability to >>publish content to an Internet site on a specific interval, or at a >>specific date/time ..... >I believe that this example is not relevant just because one is analyzing >freshness from a developer's point of view not managers (by analyzing the >scheduler audit information). After a second thought it may be of relevant after all, but no probably for managers. If you have read the post I've wrote were I related these issues with process/project content development and specially Quality you will understand what I'll say next. As I've explained concerning analyzing metrics for Quality under the scope of Content Management, Quality should be looked as a spectrum. The same reasons can be used to sustain that fresh and up to date content metrics need to be looked at as a spectrum. As I explained a managers do not care much for metrics derived by the scheduler. On the other side for a CMS Administrator the metrics provided by scheduler audit information is of importance within the scope of maintaining available fresh and up to date content. For instance it can answer how many articles, views etc failed to be published due to problems concerning the scheduler. For writers and editors maintaining content up to date can be measured by analyzing if they are up-to-date concerning the their tasks and the content they need to work on. And so on. Best regards, Nuno Lopes Independent Consultant. -- http://cms-list.org/ trim your replies for good karma.
