On Friday, December 13, 2002, Jeremy Tapp wrote:

> The Search Spider problem is another thing I'm trying to solve and
> get our team to think about.
[..]
> it comes as a perpetual source of annoyance to see how low we rank
> in search engines (especially Google) especially given that every
> day we publish 3-4 articles on each site of spot on relevant content
> for the markets.

> I've come to the conclusion that it must be spiders having difficulty
> indexing us (I hope?!).

One handy trick is to use Google to just search for pages on your
site, but search for a term which will be present on every page.  This
way you can see how many of your pages Googlebot has indexed.

A search for "site:bikemagic.com bikemagic" gives 552 results.

> (a) I know our Meta Tags aren't great and I'm looking to get that
> improved.
> (b) I've been thinking about asking the guys to insert relevant
> keywords (a required field by our CMS) into the MetaTags for each
> specific article page.

This won't actually help your ranking on Google, as Google doesn't
read meta keyword tags, but it might not be bad idea if you have the
information anyway.

> (c) How does this URL rewriting scheme you mention work?

In this context URL rewriting works by mapping "normal" looking URLs
onto server-side scripts. E.g.: instead of
http://www.bikemagic.com/news/article.asp?SP=&v=1&UAN=3057 you could
have: http://www.bikemagic.com/news/article/3057/. The server gets
setup to redirect any requests to /news/article* to the script
/news/article.asp. That script can then split the rest of the URL up
to get any other parameters.  The result is friendlier looking URLs
which are easier to remember and give a clearer representation of site
structure.

> Should I invest time getting our guys to build a spider page which
> links in simple HTML to all our article pages and submit this to the
> engines?

I wouldn't advise it.  These days search engines don't have trouble
with database driven sites.

> Has anyone got any advice please?

Search engine ranking is a tricky area, some sites get great ranking
without any effort, others have a lot of problems despite many content
tweaks.

Remember that the search engine robot sees your raw HTML source, not
what you see in your browser. To the robot, the higher up in the HTML
source text appears, the more important it is. Any non-content, e.g.
HTML markup, javascript etc. only serves to make the actual content
less-relevant.  The robot is also looking for keywords in prominent
HTML tags such as <title>...</title> and the headings (<h1>...</h1>
etc.).

Your site has quite a bit of HTML markup and javascript in each of the
page content.  Javascript functions can be put in external files
(which will reduce your bandwidth usage as well), and CSS can be used
to move quite a bit of your presentational markup out of your page
source.  How easy this would be to achieve using your CMS of choice I
don't know.

Your content may need a few tweaks, and it may be worth educating your
content authors on some of these issues. If we use your "fitting your
front end" article as an example of a typical article on your site,
then "handlebars" would seem a reasonable keyword for people to search
for. But if you look your page content, that word appears only once
and not until half way down the page. It should at least be in your
page title and your article title ("fitting your front end", which
would be better in <h1>..</h1> tags), and really you'd want the word
to appear a few times in the article itself.

Sub-headings could also help. If someone was searching for an article
on fitting controls to handlebars, then if you had "handlebars" in
your page title and "controls" in a sub-heading somewhere, your page
is more likely to get returned as a high result.

I hope this is of some use. Another tip is to do a few searches on
Google of bike-related things and take a look at the top results and
see how their page content is structured. It should be of some comfort
to you to know that if you've already got a popular site with great
content and lots of links to it, you've already got the most difficult
part of good search engine ranking out of the way!

-- 
Tim Fountain
Incutio Ltd.
www.incutio.com

--
http://cms-list.org/
trim your replies for good karma.

Reply via email to