-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 2:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cms-list digest, Vol 1 #426 - 6 msgs


Send cms-list mailing list submissions to
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://cms-list.org/mailman/listinfo/cms-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cms-list digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. CMS co-mingled data issue (tonyl/pillarsoftware)
   2. Re: CMS co-mingled data issue (Charles Reitzel)
   3. Re: FW: [cms-list] pub/london/cms (Tom Weiss)
   4. Re: Divine? (John Downs)
   5. RE: Divine? (Tony Nguyen)
   6. RE: Divine? (Steve Drucker)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: "tonyl/pillarsoftware" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 01:28:54 -0500
Subject: [cms-list] CMS co-mingled data issue

Has anyone looked at IBuySpy?

It requires a separate database installation for each instance that is
running.  EVEN on the same server each IBuySpy  would require a
different DSN.

Something like Yahoo Groups is an example of co-mingled data.

I wonder how many CMSes/Portals support co-mingled data?

IMHO co-mingled data is great because you can manage schema and database
backups...and from an ISP view point it saves resources.

Opinions?  Pro / Con for co-mingled data.




--__--__--

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 11:52:51 -0500
To: "tonyl/pillarsoftware" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Charles Reitzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [cms-list] CMS co-mingled data issue
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

In all likelihood, co-mingled data will cause many more problems than it 
will solve.  It will complicate data replication,  Application availability 
(think SLAs for each user group), backup/restore, access controls.  The 
list goes on.  The only time co-mingling would represent an advantage is in 
a static, unchanging environment.  But it's been a while since these have 
been seen in the wild...

take it easy,
Charles Reitzel

At 01:28 AM 2/17/2003 -0500, tonyl/pillarsoftware wrote:
>Has anyone looked at IBuySpy?
>
>It requires a separate database installation for each instance that is 
>running.  EVEN on the same server each IBuySpy  would require a different
DSN.
>
>Something like Yahoo Groups is an example of co-mingled data.
>
>I wonder how many CMSes/Portals support co-mingled data?
>
>IMHO co-mingled data is great because you can manage schema and database 
>backups...and from an ISP view point it saves resources.
>
>Opinions?  Pro / Con for co-mingled data.


--__--__--

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 17:23:32 +0000
From: Tom Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: [cms-list] pub/london/cms

>
>
>Reminder for Wednesday night (the 19th).
>

See you then...

t.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tom Weiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: 29 January 2003 20:58
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [cms-list] pub/london/cms
>
>
>Due to considerable demand, the pub/london/cms sessions will resume 
>after an extended Christmas break on Wednesday 20th February in the 
>Wheatsheaf pub in Stoney Street.
>
>You can get a map and directions at: 
>http://www.beerintheevening.com/pubs/show.shtml/691/
>
>You will be able to recognise the motley CMS crew from my photo here: 
>http://www.clarkweiss.com/images/tom%20web.gif
>
>I will be there from about 6:30pm - see you there!
>
>t.
>
>P.S. Extended list rules apply (e.g. sales pitches allowed when combined 
>with pitchers of beer)
>
>--
>http://cms-list.org/
>more signal, less noise.
>
>  
>



--__--__--

Message: 4
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 09:32:04 -0800 (PST)
From: John Downs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [cms-list] Divine?
To: Todd Warfel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        kwasetis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        Steve Drucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

How about Vignette or Interwoven buying them for the customer base and
maintenance contracts?

--- Todd Warfel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe Oracle...
> 
> On 2/15/03 4:03 PM, "John Downs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Could be. But the obvious buyers already have either bought solutions or
> > developed their own such
> > as MS, IBM, Filenet and Documentum.  Maybe someone in the ERP space due
to
> > divine's
> > interoperability. But most ERP say they do this anyway. Your guess is
good as
> > mine. Should be
> > interesting to watch.
> > 
> > Cheers John
> 
> 
> Cheers!
> 
> Todd R. Warfel
> 
> _//message first [method second]
> .--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--.
> _//user experience architect
> Information architecture
> Interaction design
> Usability analysis
> [P] (607) 339-9640
> [E]  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [w] http://www.messagefirst.com
> .--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--.
> 
> In theory, theory and practice are the same,
> but in practice, they're not -- anonymous
> 
> 
> --
> http://cms-list.org/
> more signal, less noise.
> 
> 
> 
> 


=====
John Downs
Strategic Clarity, Inc.
303-748-5851
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--__--__--

Message: 5
From: Tony Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 'John Downs ' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [cms-list] Divine?
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 11:48:53 -0600

I don't think Interwoven has the money.  But Vignette has $300 millions in
the bank... 

-----Original Message-----
From: John Downs
To: Todd Warfel; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; kwasetis; Steve Drucker;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2/17/2003 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: [cms-list] Divine?

How about Vignette or Interwoven buying them for the customer base and
maintenance contracts?

--- Todd Warfel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe Oracle...
> 
> On 2/15/03 4:03 PM, "John Downs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Could be. But the obvious buyers already have either bought
solutions or
> > developed their own such
> > as MS, IBM, Filenet and Documentum.  Maybe someone in the ERP space
due to
> > divine's
> > interoperability. But most ERP say they do this anyway. Your guess
is good as
> > mine. Should be
> > interesting to watch.
> > 
> > Cheers John
> 
> 
> Cheers!
> 
> Todd R. Warfel
> 
> _//message first [method second]
> .--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--.
> _//user experience architect
> Information architecture
> Interaction design
> Usability analysis
> [P] (607) 339-9640
> [E]  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [w] http://www.messagefirst.com
> .--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--.
> 
> In theory, theory and practice are the same,
> but in practice, they're not -- anonymous
> 
> 
> --
> http://cms-list.org/
> more signal, less noise.
> 
> 
> 
> 


=====
John Downs
Strategic Clarity, Inc.
303-748-5851
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
http://cms-list.org/
more signal, less noise.

--__--__--

Message: 6
From: Steve Drucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [cms-list] Divine?
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 14:27:51 -0500

Well, according to Yahoo (http://biz.yahoo.com/fin/l/v/vign.html), Vignette
may have around 270 mil in assets, but they've also got a solid burn rate
too...about 20 mil per quarter.  Ouch!

Regards,
Steve Drucker
CEO
Fig Leaf Software
www.figleaf.com
1-877-FIG-LEAF


-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 12:49 PM
To: 'John Downs '
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [cms-list] Divine?

I don't think Interwoven has the money.  But Vignette has $300 millions in
the bank... 

-----Original Message-----
From: John Downs
To: Todd Warfel; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; kwasetis; Steve Drucker;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2/17/2003 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: [cms-list] Divine?

How about Vignette or Interwoven buying them for the customer base and
maintenance contracts?

--- Todd Warfel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe Oracle...
> 
> On 2/15/03 4:03 PM, "John Downs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Could be. But the obvious buyers already have either bought
solutions or
> > developed their own such
> > as MS, IBM, Filenet and Documentum.  Maybe someone in the ERP space
due to
> > divine's
> > interoperability. But most ERP say they do this anyway. Your guess
is good as
> > mine. Should be
> > interesting to watch.
> > 
> > Cheers John
> 
> 
> Cheers!
> 
> Todd R. Warfel
> 
> _//message first [method second]
> .--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--.
> _//user experience architect
> Information architecture
> Interaction design
> Usability analysis
> [P] (607) 339-9640
> [E]  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [w] http://www.messagefirst.com
> .--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--.
> 
> In theory, theory and practice are the same,
> but in practice, they're not -- anonymous
> 
> 
> --
> http://cms-list.org/
> more signal, less noise.
> 
> 
> 
> 


=====
John Downs
Strategic Clarity, Inc.
303-748-5851
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
http://cms-list.org/
more signal, less noise.
--
http://cms-list.org/
more signal, less noise.


--__--__--

--
http://cms-list.org/

End of cms-list Digest
--
http://cms-list.org/
more signal, less noise.

Reply via email to