Rob van der Heij wrote:
> When you name the fields, you can see both at the same time
Right, but I can't tell a missing field from an empty reading station
when I go to compare them. I guess what I was imagining was a SELECT
BOTH that would allow any items other than input field specifications to
be processed only when there were records at both stations.
> 'if first()||eof() then noprint',
AHA! I looked for TOF() by analogy with EOF() and somehow didn't manage
to find FIRST() even though I thought I'd looked for "run-in." That's
exactly what I needed:
if b>=a&¬first() then write
¬R
