After thinking about this for a week, I'm going to agree with Rob's point of
view here. I
think this is the desired behavior as well.
Rob van der Heij wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 3:53 PM, John Hartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When the output placement is a member of a structure it will have a
length and thus such a specification item will never be ignored. But
is this desirable?
I think it is. After all, when you map the output record by
structures, it is a fixed layout that should not lack fields. Except
maybe for a member with length * ?
Rob
--
DJ
V/Soft
z/VM and mainframe Linux expertise, training,
consulting, and software development
www.vsoft-software.com
