Thats an interesting idea, thank you. -- bc
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Christian Reichetzeder<[email protected]> wrote: > This might spoil the party, but why not splitting the reference in > contractors > and non-contractors and using two lookup stages. Split the details too and > feed the unmatched contractors to the second lookup. You can even combine > the > matched details afterwards since no delay is introduced. Or am *I* missing > something? > > Christian >
