On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Paul Gilmartin<[email protected]> wrote:

> o It's atomic: the operation is synchronized to guarantee
>  that no concurrent process can pereive the absence of
>  the replaced file.   (I.e. no "RC=28" timing window
>  for shared files.)  But I'm most familiar with MDFS;
>  perhaps the work unit isolation of SFS provides similar
>  function.

But we all learned about NOUPDIRT to make a series of RENAME commands
an atomic operation.

Rob

Reply via email to