Yes indeed, but it isn't far away: remember EXEC2? GMTTIME EXEC A1 V 130 Trunc=130 ====> !...+....1....+....2....+....3....+.... * * * Top of File * * * &TRACE CP Q T CP Q TIMEZONE &TYPE GMT Date and time: &DATE &TIME * * * End of File * * *
TIME IS 16:32:01 CET TUESDAY 2009-11-03 CONNECT= 05:22:27 VIRTCPU= 000:02.22 TOTCPU= 000:02.38 Zone Direction Offset Status UTC ---- 00.00.00 Inactive GMT ---- 00.00.00 Inactive CET East 01.00.00 Active CES East 02.00.00 Inactive GMT Date and time: 09/11/03 15:32:01 2009/11/3 Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> > On Nov 3, 2009, at 07:54, Bob Cronin wrote: > > Our VM clocks are so far off that I wouldn't even care if the >> answer I got >> from the ntp server was a few seconds off because of latency... >> >> Will VM _ever_ learn to use ETR, STP, whatever? Last I heard it > couldn't, > much less being leap second aware. Causes us problems with z/OS guests. > > Wonder why GMT isn't among the numerous date() and time() formats > provided by Rexx? > > -- gil > -- Kris Buelens, IBM Belgium, VM customer support
