Has anyone seen this?:
Ready; T=0.05/0.06 15:18:51
testpack
4 *-* address 'COMMAND'
6 *-* 'PIPE QUERY'
>>> "PIPE QUERY"
PIPINX086I CMS/TSO Pipelines, 5654-030/5655-A17 1.0112
(Version.Release/Mod) - Generated 11 Mar 2010 at 10:24:55.
8 *-* 'PIPE < $ANY$ PLCDU D' , '| PACK' , '| > $ANY$ PACK D F'
>>> "PIPE < $ANY$ PLCDU D | PACK | > $ANY$ PACK D F"
12 *-* 'COPYFILE $ANY$ PACK D = UNPK = (REPL UNPACK'
>>> "COPYFILE $ANY$ PACK D = UNPK = (REPL UNPACK"
DMSCPY132S File $ANY$ PACK D1 too large
+++ RC(99) +++
14 *-* 'PIPE < $ANY$ PACK D' , '| UNPACK' , '| > $ANY$ UNP2 D'
>>> "PIPE < $ANY$ PACK D | UNPACK | > $ANY$ UNP2 D"
Ready; T=0.14/0.15 15:18:57
listfile $ANY$ * D (LABEL
FILENAME FILETYPE FM FORMAT LRECL RECS BLOCKS DATE
TIME LABEL
$ANY$ PLCDU D1 V 80 4682 92 3/30/10
14:51:09 TDISKD
$ANY$ PACK D1 F 1024 270 68 3/30/10
15:18:57 TDISKD
$ANY$ UNP2 D1 V 80 4682 92 3/30/10
15:18:57 TDISKD
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 15:26:42
o The source is a VMFPLCD archive.
o The packed file generated by PIPE PACK is the same size
as one generated by COPYFILE ( PACK, but has pervasive
local differences.
o The file unpacked by PIPE UNPACK is identical to the
original input.
o No, I'm not in a position to instruct all my users to
eschew COPYFILE and cleave to Pipelines.
Thanks,
gil
