Bob,

Message is 30 is issued for each active stage after message 29, which
is the real message to say the pipeline is stalled.  Are you sure it
was a pipeline message 30 you saw?  Without msg 29, that is unlikely.
Seeing just one msg 30 is also rather unlikely (though pipe f:fanin|:f
will produce just the one).

Which module issued msg 30?

(Audit sounds like some local bolt-on.)

Cheers,

   j.

On 5 October 2010 21:00, Bob Cronin <[email protected]> wrote:
> The only reason I said it stalled was because the pipeline returned rc=30
> which is doc'd as:
>
> 30I       Stage is in state <state>
>
>  Explanation:   The  pipeline is stalled.   The state of each stage is
> listed.
>  The following states are defined:
>
> So you tell me, did it stall or not?
>
> Further investigation showed the SFS filepool server had abended due to a
> corrupted AUDIT disk (whatever that is).
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
> --
> bc
>
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Kris Buelens <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Most of the time such errors mean you have to get in touch with SW support.
>> To get the message number, you could
>> - ACCESS 19D as Z
>> - use a tool to scan all DMS* HELPMSG Z files for string "Detecting module"
>>
>> 2010/10/5 Bob Cronin <[email protected]>
>>
>> > I had a pipe stall (return code 30) in the middle of writing a file to an
>> > SFS directory using ">". The only clue as to what might have been wrong
>> was
>> > this cryptic error message I found on the console log:
>> >
>> > Error 76000 for file pool XAGSFS; error codes -1 and -115; Detecting
>> module
>> > DMS3WM
>> >
>> > Sadly, I don't have the actual message number.
>> >
>> > All subsequent attempts to write to the filepool failed (with rc 30 or
>> 31)
>> > for about the next 45 minutes, after which the problem mysteriously went
>> > away by itself (i.e. without any help from me, anyway).
>> >
>> > Anyone ever seen this or have any suggestions what might be going on?
>> > --
>> > bc
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Kris Buelens,
>> IBM Belgium, VM customer support
>>
>

Reply via email to