"John P. Hartmann" wrote:
> Glen, am I correct in infering that the frtarget test case (the first
> one) works with the pipeline at Marist, but the second one fails?
Right. Trying the older versions I have saved, I see the first one
works on 110B0009 but not 110A0026.
Here's a similar test of the CALLPIPE LOOKUP|GATE case:
pipe query level
CMS/TSO Pipelines, 5654-030/5655-A17 level 110C0006.
pipe (end /) literal 1 2 3 4 5|split|a:lookbad|cons /literal 3|a:
6 *-* 'callpipe (end /) *..0: | exact: lookup detail | end: gate' ,
'/ *..1: | exact: | end: | *..0:'
>>> "callpipe (end /) *..0: | exact: lookup detail | end: gate
/ *..1: | exact: | end: | *..0:"
1
2
+++ Interactive trace. TRACE OFF to end debug, ENTER to
continue. +++
9 *-* 'peekto line'
>>> "peekto line"
10 *-* Say line
>>> "4"
4
Looks like this happens only when the alternate output of GATE is
connected. Leave off the CONS stage, and the 3 is left in the pipeline.
¬R
